The most consequential design decisions happen early—when flexibility is highest and change is least disruptive.
Our process uses proprietary Lean Architect workflows, embedded within familiar platforms such as Revit and Rhino, to explore and evaluate multiple design scenarios in parallel. While the video shown here illustrates one specific example, these same workflows are applied across a wide range of building types, including schools, data centers, parking facilities, multifamily, and mixed-use projects.
By transferring repetitive analysis and scenario testing to technology, our teams remain focused on design judgment, trade-offs, and alignment—supporting clearer decisions before direction is locked.
Example shown: Scenario testing applied to one project type. The same workflow extends across multiple building typologies.
Reliable documentation depends on consistency, coordination, and clear intent—not just speed.
We use proprietary Lean Architect tools to support documentation directly within industry-standard environments such as Revit. These workflows reduce manual repetition, strengthen QA/QC, and help maintain alignment between models and drawings as projects advance.
The video shown here highlights a single task-based workflow. In practice, our teams actively work with an extensive ecosystem of custom tools and over 60 APIs to support sheet generation, tagging, dimensioning, coordination checks, and documentation accuracy across complex project scopes.
Example shown: Task-based documentation workflow within a live project model. Representative of a broader QA/QC-supported documentation framework.
Design decisions carry downstream implications for systems, code compliance, and construction execution.
Our process integrates proprietary Lean Architect workflows—supported by advanced analysis and AI-assisted checks—into shared, industry-standard platforms. This allows teams to review coordination requirements, compare design and shop drawings, and identify conflicts earlier in the process, when they can be addressed with less disruption.
We collaborate closely with engineers, contractors, and consultants using forward-thinking tools such as Bluebeam, while remaining adaptable to the workflows and platforms already in use across the project team. The objective is seamless coordination, not imposed systems.
Example shown: Travel distance verification within a coordinated building model. Representative of a broader, discipline-aware coordination workflow.